There is a scene in the movie “Ghostbusters” where Bill Murray tells Harold Ramis that he is still “a little fuzzy on the whole good-bad thing.” Ramis proceeds to lay out the ultimate doomsday scenario they face which involves imagining all life as they know it stopping instantaneously and every molecule of their bodies “exploding at the speed of light.” Suddenly, it’s quite clear. I mean, how couldn’t it be with that explanation?
Unfortunately, I’m still a bit fuzzy on the pot of economic development money at the DRPA. And the interview we did yesterday ( see below ) with CEO John Matheussen didn’t make it much clearer.
In a taping of NJN’s On The Record, Matheussen told NJN Senior Political Correspondent Michael Aron that in 2008 the DRPA approved a resolution ending the practice of spending toll money on those controversial economic development projects. But as we pointed out in the last post, The DRPA actually continues to spend that money including committing $1.5 million to the Army-Navy game over the next six years. That was voted on in 2009, long after the resolution supposedly stopping the practice was passed.
But wait, there is more. According to internal documents, the board approved 62 resolutions authorizing economic development spending since the resolution ( which supposedly outlawed it ) was passed on 8/15/08. That’s right, 62.
Matheussen explains that they are merely spending what was left over…not new dollars. Fine, but couldn’t that money have been be redirected back to the DRPA’s core mission? After all, wasn’t the intent of the ’08 resolution to end that controversial practice once and for all??? Or was it merely window dressing? Something doesn’t add up here. And it’s particularly noteworthy since there was a long, spirited debate during the DRPA special board meeting on August 25 about whether to continue toll discounts for seniors and others. we heard dire warnings that if the senior discount continues the loss of revenue could affect the agency’s bond rating. Apparently no one was worried about that bond rating when the agency spent money on clean energy wind turrbines on top of the aquarium that apparently do not spin.
Wednesday’s story. Be sure to watch the interview after the taped piece.